Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Brady


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Sir Brady

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of reliable sources. All references but one are to youtube or a site controlled by the subject gadfium 19:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The one independent source is to a local newspaper in 2010 which pictures the subject on the front page performing a farewell ceremony at school. This is not sufficient to show notability. The link to his upcoming performance in a school play is not viewable by the public, but such a performance does not show notability.
 * An earlier version of this article was speedy deleted at Sir brady. The current article is significantly better developed than that was.- gadfium 21:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as all of this is still questionable for the applicable notability, nothing else convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  00:20, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable "Youtube star" lacking coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 03:43, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails SIGCOV. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 03:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly a self promotion. Everything I am sure is uploaded by the YouTube artist himself . He even tweeted that he now has a Wikipedia page now. --TheDomain (talk) 02:16, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Also based on his sites number of views, he is not notable in terms of You Tube at this stage. NealeFamily (talk) 21:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.