Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir C. V. Raman Institute of Technology and Sciences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Sir C. V. Raman Institute of Technology and Sciences

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No RS with a BEFORE. Not to be confused with a similar named research institute. No inherent notability. Advertisement. Vikram Vincent 14:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * To the closing admin: The keep !votes have not provided any RS or policy to support their assertion. VV 17:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:28, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete From what I can tell all the sources in the article are either primary or otherwise connected to the organization in a way that would make them non-usable for notability. There's was nothing in a BEFORE that isn't extremely trivial or would pass WP:NORG either. So, I'm going with delete. Unless someone can come up with three good sources. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution, which consensus has been to keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a private institution hence there is no inherent notability. Vikram Vincent 13:47, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Not sure where you get that from. We have never treated private colleges any differently from public ones. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Like I said in the other AfD where you responded the same exact way WP:NORG pretty clearly says "All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy WP:ORG, general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." --Adamant1 (talk) 00:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment unless someone can come with WP:THREE sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOLS the article needs to be deleted. The last few pages I nominated for AFD are being deleted so the "consensus" is moving to delete non-notable tertiary institutes. Vikram Vincent 06:59, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:09, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Accredited private institution, which consensus has been to keep. --  MRRaja001  (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Vikram Vincent 14:51, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
 * It would be good to read up WP:NSCHOOL. If you can identify WP:THREE sources that support notability I'll withdraw the AFD nomination. Best! Vikram Vincent 14:55, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. Private educational institute with no claim of notability. Riteboke (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - weak presumptions of notability are simply not enough. WP:NORG is extremely clear about what is required and this does not meet any aspect of it. We need sourcing that establishes notability not just bare-minimum database coverage that merely proves that the institution exists. I'll admit that I'm not from India so I wouldn't necessarily have access to all of the necessary sources but there is no significant coverage in any of the searches that I did attempt and I'm not convinced that we ought to assume that such coverage exists. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:10, 14 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.