Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Francis Moncrieff Kerr-Jarrett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:00, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Sir Francis Moncrieff Kerr-Jarrett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: there is absolutely no reason, so far as I can see, to be class this guy as notable. Delete. Bristolbottom (talk) 19:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. For God's sake, this man had a knighthood. Easily meets WP:ANYBIO #1. Also a prominent businessman in Jamaica. Also served on the Legislative Council of Jamaica, and thus meets WP:POLITICIAN. This nominator appears to have no idea of the guidelines for biographical articles on Wikipedia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:53, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * keep No valid reason for deletion. The nominator seems to have a WP:COI with User:MJT21.--114.81.255.40 (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, obviously. Any of the three reasons provided by Necrothesp would be enough alone. &mdash;innotata 04:03, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Necrothesp. The nom. could perhaps be forgiven for this series of nominations that failed to take into account Wikipedia guidelines, as he/she is a new editor making their first edit on 30 August 2014; however, there seems to be no basis for selecting for Afd a series almost exclusively of the work-product of one editor. --Bejnar (talk) 04:58, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * However, the first edits of a new editor being a string of AfD nominations is a little odd (most of us edit for a while before getting into procedural things like this) and suggests, given all the articles were created by the same editor, that there's something else going on here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:38, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. A knighthood satisfies criteria 1 of WP:ANYBIO. James500 (talk) 12:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.