Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Frank Lampl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep and move to Frank Lampl per MOS. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 05:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Sir Frank Lampl


Non-notable yandman  13:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Alberta
 * Keep but move to Frank Lampl. Verifiable businessman, see sources -, . Catchpole 14:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable businessman, there are even reliable sources i.e. Forbes to cite. All business men from Forbes are notable, he has also a peerage. Isn't that notable enough? --Ter e nce Ong (C 15:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep certainly notable from his biography Optimale  Gu 15:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It would be helpful if the nomination contained more than two words to explain why he or she finds the subject to be non-notable.  Yamaguchi先生 05:50, 9 November 2006
 * Move to remove the Sir. -- lucasbfr talk 05:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.