Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Harry Cowell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Sir Harry Cowell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article doesn’t possess in-depth significant coverage in Reliable sources. Most sources given in the article are not reliable sources. Subject of article fails WP:GNG & WP:SINGER. Furthermore a similar article on subject of article has once been deleted in the past. Celestina007 (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: Previous AfD discussion here (2014). AllyD (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: clearly non-notable. Couldn't find independent reliable sources that didn't cover him in passing as a "producer". PK650 (talk) 21:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. First off, he has never been knighted - sir is a campy nickname he uses, like "Sir" Ari Gold or "Empress" Panzi. Secondly, as far as public sources go, he's never been a professional, full-time musician. Thirdly, this is just a run of the mill producer and band manager, which articles we uniformly delete and a change in that consensus is not predicted. For these three reason, the subject fails our standards for musicians. Coverage online is about the "vault" of music he is connected with, not that he's created, and in any case only mentions him in passing. Bearian (talk) 16:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
 * P.S. I acknowledge my error in !voting otherwise in the AfD five years ago. See, you can teach an old dog new tricks. Bearian (talk) 16:47, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: The passing coverage in industry publications of ventures involving the subject are insufficient to establish his biographical notability. Past involvement in signing Katherine Jenkins and subsequent ventures with Simon Napier-Bell do not provide notability. I am seeing nothing to overturn the 2014 AfD consensus on the prior version. AllyD (talk) 09:11, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. non-notable fails WP:GNG.- Nahal (T) 23:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.