Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir John Ramsden, 9th Baronet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. North America1000 03:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Sir John Ramsden, 9th Baronet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

English nobleman who fails WP:BIO and WP:ANYBIO.

Peerage websites are unreliable sources per WP:RSN/P (see entry) and Burke's peerage is only reliable for genealogy; the London Gazette is a primary source related to his diplomatic father's nomination (only a passing mention); Who's Who UK was downgraded to generally unreliable at RSP last week, and the inclusion of peers is automatic; the Huddersfield Local History Society does not cover the subject at all; and Cryptome only gives a passing mention (and is hardly reliable). Pilaz (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. Pilaz (talk) 17:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
 * - Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing.
 * Logs:
 * --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.