Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Lyonel Tollemache, 4th Baronet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   snow keep. (non-admin closure) ansh 666 05:46, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Sir Lyonel Tollemache, 4th Baronet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

OK on a genealogy site, but Lyonel appears to have done nothing to pass Wp:notability on ours Crusoe8181 (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:02, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article's subject's donation of Ham House to the National Trust is clearly notable. This new article already contains several reliable, independent sources that meet WP:GNG and I and others will probably find more over time. In addition and anyway, there is considerable contextual value in being able to click through the succession of what may today be considered a relatively minor baronetage. Deleting this article would just create pressure to amalgamate the content with the over-arching, preceding and/or succeeding Tollemache baronets articles which would be clumsy and potentially confusing. --KenBailey (talk) 17:39, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:22, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - meets WP:GNG; as stated by this article already has several Reliable sources. The ownership and subsequent donation of Ham House make him notable and helps add context to readers of the Ham House article.   SagaciousPhil   -  Chat  11:55, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. As above; and I think baronets are notable, just by virtue of being baronets (unfashionable view on Wikipedia, I know). There aren't that many of them left.45ossington (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.