Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Peter Osborne, 17th Baronet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:16, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Sir Peter Osborne, 17th Baronet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails to explain why he is notable, beyond holding a minor (inherited) aristocratic title. If someone is ennobled based on their own merits, they are probably notable. But just having inherited the title "Sir" makes him no more notable than a e.g. someone from the European continent who has the particle von, de or di in their name on account of some ancestor's ennoblement. We don't even automatically assume that counts and other holders of far higher aristocratic titles are notable if they are from the European continent. Tataral (talk) 04:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no claim of notability. MLA (talk) 08:05, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with the above Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Of the refs, one is dead and two of the other three relate to his son, George Osborne and not to the article subject. Neiltonks (talk) 11:07, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability claimed, can be redirected to Osborne baronets instead. -- Emphrase 15:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.