Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Peter Sassoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete. Amortias (T)(C) 12:38, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Sir Peter Sassoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am unable to find any information about the existence of this "baronet". The Sassoon family certainly exist, but he's not a part of it. The only link in the article does not mention any Peter Sassoon. ... disco spinster   talk  19:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. This is pure fantasy. The article claims that the alleged Sir Peter owns 43% of HSBC: if true, this would make him one of the richest people in the world, but he has no Google presence, nor does he come up on a Reuters search. The Guardian has mentioned in passing a Peter Sassoon Munns, who has married into the famous family, but none of the other details match up. I have added Template:Hoax to the article, because of the BLP implications for Mr Sassoon Munns and his relatives. Matt's talk 21:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is obviously a hoax article. CataracticPlanets (talk) 21:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete This is an obvious hoax. The creator has continued to add "sources" all of which indicate this is not a real person. CHRISSY MAD  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  12:32, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.