Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Richard Johnston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedily Deleted (non-admin closure) by Athaenara per CSD G12 as blatant copyright infringement. WilliamH (talk) 22:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Sir Richard Johnston

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Confusing, Bad quality, looks like crap. AlwaysOnion (talk) 21:10, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as copyvio of peerage.com and the geocities page linked in the article. So tagged. Deor (talk) 21:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * (edit conflist) Keep: Sounds like a candidate for a good cleanup, not for deletion. I'll have a poke around, but regardless this does not mean any of the WP:AfD criteria. Just saw the copyright violation. Clear speedy del candidate.  Plasticup  T / C  21:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.