Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Stanley John Odell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Tone 17:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Sir Stanley John Odell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete: surely being president of the National Association of Conservative Associations for 12 months is not sufficient for notability? Delete. Bristolbottom (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. He's been knighted for God's sake. Clearly meets WP:ANYBIO #1. Getting a bit fed up with this editor's scattergun nomination of people who clearly meet our notability guidelines. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)


 * keep No valid reason for deletion. The nominator seems to have a WP:COI with User:MJT21.--114.81.255.37 (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep he had a knighthood, so notable. &mdash;innotata 04:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Clearly the new editor (first edit 30 August 2014) who made this nomination is unfamiliar with the notability guidelines. Keep per Necrothesp. --Bejnar (talk) 05:44, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Knighthood satisfies criteria 1 of WP:ANYBIO. James500 (talk) 13:13, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.