Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir Thomas Western, 3rd Baronet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Anybody is free to create the proposed redirect to Western baronets.  Sandstein  07:33, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Sir Thomas Western, 3rd Baronet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject appears to fail WP:BASIC and, of course, WP:NOTGENEALOGY. He held a number of local positions that aristocrats frequently held. Coverage I could find was only entries in genealogical works. His father was notable as an MP, but he is not. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep I fail to see why he shouldn't be notable enough for an article - but the article in question could of course need some improvements. Oleryhlolsson (talk) 22:18, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Baronets unlike Dukes, Marquesses, Earls, Viscounts and Barons aren't peers of the United Kingdom. So unless a Baronet does some significant work to establish notability, I fail to see why they should have their own articles. Majority of the article's content about said baronet is about how he inherited his father's money and blew it off on boondoggle. Nothing that hasn't been seen before in history. Plus the article is of very poor quality and I don't see why any editor should have to clean-up another editor's mess for no apparent reason. TheRedDomitor (talk) 02:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:46, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not very substantial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.110.217.186 (talk)
 * Comment clear ATD - redirect to Western baronets if found non-notable. Boleyn (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.