Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirens of Soho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Bethenny (TV series). Black Kite (talk) 17:56, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Sirens of Soho

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per criterion #10 of WP:MUSIC: "Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E for further clarifications)"

This band's only claim to notability is having performed the theme song for the talk show Bethenny. There's no other third-party independent sources I could find for this group. Arbor to SJ (talk) 04:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:54, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

While you may not know of the group, it meets criterion #10, and the song is available on iTunes. Don Williams (talk) 05:51, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * So the group should redirect to the Bethenny TV show article instead. Just because a song is available on iTunes doesn't make a band notable. Arbor to SJ (talk) 21:17, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge, per nom. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:57, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Delete and merge" is not an acceptable action: if any content is merged, a redirect must be left behind to preserve the edit history. To do otherwise violates the licensing conditions. &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 16:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 13:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.