Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirica (Kirby)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to Kirby series characters. Mailer Diablo 01:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Sirica (Kirby)
This is a character with a relatively small role on the Kirby anime- not enough to have her own page. She already has a description over at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kirby_series_characters#Sirica so this extra article isn't needed, and just has a lot of poorly written junk info (and unmarked spoilers!) Ivyna J. Spyder 04:05, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Opinion: Although this is a character that appears rarely, I know that a few people like researching their favourite characters and I happen to be one of them. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.29.172.68 (talk • contribs)

- The article still isn't needed. The character is covered on the other page just fine, there is nothing important added on this one, most of it is just speculation and no actual facts. --Ivyna J. Spyder 04:33, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:31, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- TheFarix (Talk) 17:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * WP:FICT is quite clear that minor characters should not be given their own articles unless they are extremely important. I know enough of Ivyna to trust her judgement on Kirby issues. If any useful detail in this article is missing from the description in Kirby series characters, merge it there, then redirect this (it's not a terribly likely search term, but it's plausible, and redirects are cheap). &mdash; Haeleth Talk 22:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lots of NPOV and OR problems. If you trim the article to remove the OR fluff, you're left with the rather nice description posted at Kirby series characters. - Wickning1 14:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 17:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


 * 'Merge and Redirect; while you are at it, remove the OR and speculation, would you? --Rhwawn Talk to Rhwawn 03:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom--  Mertens21  Talk  05:54, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 *  Delete Redirect, Duplicated by Kirby series characters. I also don't think there is anything useful to merge that isn't original research or unsourced. --TheFarix (Talk) 17:24, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kirby series characters, nothing to merge. --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:27, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge as above, Kirby series characters would be the correct place for this entry. LinaMishima 21:00, 31 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.