Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirius Software

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. --Tony Sidaway Talk 01:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Sirius Software
Not notable, possible vanity. Mirror Vax 23:12, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Encyclopedic article about a software company that produced a lot of material for the Apple II in the 80's. A Google search for "Sirius Software" "Apple II" returns 13,200 hits. —Charles O'Rourke 23:16, August 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Disclaimer:  I'm the author of the article.  That being said:  how can Sirius Software possibly be considered "vanity?"  As for notability, I guess one could debate it, but they had an entire chapter in Steven Levy's book Hackers devoted to them, as is indicated in the article.  MirrorVax, could you indicate your criteria for notability here?  I want to make sure I understand the objections. Nandesuka 23:28, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Just because they were active in the 1980s and shut down over 20 years ago doesn't mean they can't be included here.  I'd say they're just as notable as Electronic Arts, id Software, or any other video game company. --Idont Havaname 00:52, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per IDHAN. Sdedeo 01:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable company.Amren (talk)  03:00, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Not notable? How soon they forget. Notable for historical reasons if nothing else. 23skidoo 05:08, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and delist.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 06:32, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. sigh. Trollderella 06:57, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep 1980s software companies for major systems which get mentions in book are notable. (Although I'd like to see: Sirius was noted for its dramatically quick rise to prominence and its equally quick collapse. changed to something less dramatic). - Mgm|(talk) 08:31, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.