Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:05, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Sisters (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability - Arts  Rescuer  •  Talk me  11:06, 15 May 2016 (UTC) — ArtsRescuer (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Shafinusri (talk • contribs).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as still nothing actually convincing of the applicable notability and I've found nothing better. SwisterTwister   talk  05:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I could see this qualifying under criterion #5 of WP:NMEDIA, but I see no evidence of outsize influence in the community of British Muslim women. I also don't see any coverage besides passing mentions in reliable sources (i.e. not blogs). MisterRandomized (talk) 04:58, 23 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.