Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters of Adoration, Slaves of the Blessed Sacrament and of Charity


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 00:30, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Sisters of Adoration, Slaves of the Blessed Sacrament and of Charity

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This entire article is unreferenced and is written in a format that is advertising. This is a blatant violation of Wikipedia policy. 155blue (talk) 00:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep I just split of the biographical part. This is a notable religious order, and we should not delete the article. This is a transition in progress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Weak keep or merge to Maria Micaela Desmaisieres. The nom provides no valid deletion criteria at all. There is some news coverage, but this seems to be a purely Spanish order unaffiliated with other orders called "Sisters of Adoration," so coverage is thin. -- 202.124.72.14 (talk) 12:03, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a legitimate RC order. We normally keep articles on these, particularly if, as claimed, it has thousands of members. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Roman Catholic orders of nuns usually meet WP:ORG via multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage. Edison (talk) 01:36, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep -- I am looking at the article after it has been purged of the bio of its founder (or inspirer). The order has apparenbtly gone throught the ritual of getting its founder canonised, indicating that the Catholic Church considers her important.  Even if this were only a Spanish order, I think we should keep it, but it is a mere stub.  I re-formated the external links, but have nbot followed them.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.