Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chambery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete as copyvio, redirect set per User:Paularblaster. Pegasus &laquo;C&brvbar;T&raquo; 22:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sisters of Saint Joseph of Chambery

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable. Hardly any information given. The sites are weak and simple searches yield nothing notable. Metal Head (talk) 05:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Is it possible to merge all of the "Sisters of Saint Joseph of X" articles together? That would be preferable to deletion. Bearian (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Question How many are there? Metal Head (talk) 14:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure, but I know of the Sisters of Saint Joseph of Carondolet. Bearian (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
 * That one is in Sisters of St. Joseph. There are also Sisters of Saint Joseph of Medaille, Sisters of Saint Joseph of Orange and Congregation of the Sisters of St. Joseph of Bourg. Sisters of St Joseph of the Sacred Heart and Sisters of St. Joseph of Peace appear to be not directly related in the same way. --Bduke (talk) 03:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 04:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Lots of room for improvement. Benkenobi18 (talk) 07:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as plagiarism. If not for that it would be an editing issue. Just about any international religious order can easily meet policy requirements, so notability should not be in doubt. There should be no objection to re-creation as a properly sourced article free of copyright violations. This order is already dealt with in brief at Sisters of St. Joseph: perhaps a redirect to that would be in order until a policy-compliant article is written? --Paularblaster (talk) 00:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.