Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sistranser Bach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Hog Farm Talk 04:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Sistranser Bach

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article claims this is a small river, but I can't verify its existence. Article also claims it has "excellent water quality". Rusf10 (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * delete The German WP article is nearly identical, except it leaves off the water supply part and has a picture of a tiny creek in what looks to be a culvert. I can't see how this is notable. Mangoe (talk) 15:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, jp×g 06:40, 10 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.