Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sit Mamudpur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Sit Mamudpur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparently unnotable; no sources, stub. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 17:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep- Per point one of WP:GEOLAND, "Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history." There are sources that verify it exists and is a village in Bangladesh.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GEOLAND. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:29, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. per WP:GEOLAND.-- Nahal (T) 07:33, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. per WP:GEOLAND. --SalmanZ (talk) 13:49, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. per WP:GEOLAND and close per WP:SNOW.4meter4 (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.