Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sit Still, Look Pretty (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Daya (EP). Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Sit Still, Look Pretty (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Although the song has been announced as a single, there hasn't been a set radio release date for it. [Note: Radio Disney and a few local stations have played it as of January 1, 2016, when the artist announced it as a single] There isn't any significant coverage for the song [Critical reception, radio release date, chart entries, etc.] to have it's own article, making it fail WP:NOTABILITY standards. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!)  16:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 16:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect - Minimal content present, song did not chart, only references present document the fact that she didn't chart. It's a viable search term, though the disambiguation can be dropped, as there doesn't appear to be any article at Sit Still, Look Pretty. It should be moved to there, and then redirected to the EP (or the artist if the EP is deleted or in danger of deletion). Sergecross73   msg me  17:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete – Fails WP:NOTABILITY. — I B  [ Poke  ] 10:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:13, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment: Pinging editors to get their comments on the new consensus.  ilovechristianmusic  (Tell Me Something!)  00:40, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't follow - what new development has happened since I last commented? Sergecross73   msg me  00:52, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

NorthAmerica1000 relisted it for a clearer consensus. ilovechristianmusic (Tell Me Something!)  00:59, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect for now (though am also fine with deletion); not significantly covered in any reliable sources, but no prejudice against recreation if this changes in the future given that it hasn't been out for very long and could gain enough detail to warrant its own article. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:44, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Apologies, usually when I get pinged back to these discussions, its because someone has reworked an article, found more sources, or something like that, and they want me to consider changing my stance. Regardless, I'm glad a better consensus is now developing. Sergecross73   msg me  18:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – fails WP:NSONGS; a single requires its own notability. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 01:26, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to EP article. Not notable, but a plausible search term.--MaranoFan (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.