Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Site management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Site management
Article appears to be a copy of documentation specific to the workplace of the author; original author has posted all content (all other edits are tagging); article lacks context. which is currently adopted to maintain the required / desired productivity at the site. 'The site'? Article is not really encyclopedic. --Draicone (talk) 08:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - still can't figure out what site management is actually referring to, and what there is of the article looks like instructional text. -- Whpq 13:54, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tonywalton | Talk 15:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Per nom M  a  rtinp23  19:19, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Reads like a chapter from a textbook or manual - probably is. Baseball,Baby!   balls  •  strikes  21:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Site Management is a notable topic. The article just needs major cleanup and wikification. --HResearcher 01:43, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - not to mention a total rewrite. Haven't we got enough articles demanding this sort of attention already? --Draicone (talk) 04:05, 16 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.