Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siterra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Siterra

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  21:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: seems to be another B2B company with numerous press releases published here and there and the steady stream of nearly one-line news about partnerships and acquisitions. I don't see its impact on world's history. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)




 * Delete - lacks 3rd party refs to establish notability; advert tone; created by an SPA as likely spam/promotional.Dialectric (talk) 01:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.