Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sites of interest of Kansas City


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep and move title to List of notable sites in Kansas City Mandsford 01:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Sites of interest of Kansas City

 * – ( View AfD View log )

POV and original research —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kansas City, Missouri. A list of sites is, by itself, not POV or original research. What makes them "interesting" might be. However, I don't see much problems with this list, but it's not worth its own article. J I P  &#124; Talk 18:52, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep and rename to List of notable sites in Kansas City. It's clearly a list, it's clearly intending to list sites which are notable (and which therefore have a Wikipedia article) and thus it has a defined scope and potential value as a navigation tool, making it allowable per WP:SALAT. - DustFormsWords (talk) 04:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename. Good list, could use some copyediting... I like the suggested name from Dust...--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:19, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename. I disagree that it is a list of notable sites, as several of the tours are never likely to become notable on their own. It is rather a list of tourist attractions and should be renamed. List of tourist attractions in Bangalore would be a good model for format. --Danger (talk) 18:35, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.