Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sittercity.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator but not enough participation to determine consensus. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Sittercity.com

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable website with thin and insubstantial coverage; created in good faith after an AFC request, but still fails WP:WEB Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  19:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 20:21, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: With plenty of news coverage and a few book mentions, I'm thinking that the site makes the cut. The article as it is now, though, needs a complete overhaul to stop being a press release. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 05:26, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.