Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Situation, objective, action, results, aftermath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:22, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

Situation, objective, action, results, aftermath

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is not a notable strategy. Looking up sources for the completely unsourced article only found blog posts and self-published help books. Why? I Ask (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Logic and Business. Why? I Ask (talk) 13:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Situation: unsourced article for AfD, Objective: Determine notability Action: Delete for lack of sourcing; only sources found are blogs as discussed below. Results: yet to be determined. Aftermath: either deleted or not deleted, resulting in a better wiki experience. Oaktree b (talk) 15:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak delete. HR sites discuss it: [][][], but if this model is a thing, then it's supposed to have a creator or a book it came from. --Suitskvarts (talk) 13:07, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.