Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivagiri Vidyaniketan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. BD2412 T 21:28, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Sivagiri Vidyaniketan

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable school, nothing notable found in WP:RELIABILITY and Fails WP:GNG.  Yogesh Warah Talk 04:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 04:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 04:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 04:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah Talk 04:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions.  Yogesh Warah <B style="color:skyblue">Talk</B> 04:19, 29 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Aluva: The subject fails WP:NSCHOOL. Only considering the less strict WP:GNG here.Sources in the article definitely do not meet WP:GNG.  Searching with   does not yield wp:reliable sources that are wp:independent with wp:significant coverage. Using the native name from Google Maps, querying with   returns one result that only provides basic information for a school.  So the subject fails WP:GNG.Suggest redirection per WP:ATD-R.  The list at the redirect target does not seem to have notability requirements for inclusion so a redirect is possible. ~  Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 13:31, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT, WP:GNG, WP:NCORP and my standards for schools. First off, it's so poorly written as to be difficult for the ordinary reader to understand it. Secondly, there's a lack of coverage as an organization or generically. I don't see anything that would allow it to meet my standards for high schools. For example, it appears that it only recently was a primary school, and in the past few years graduated a "batch" of students. I evaluate schools on a case-by-case basis, and this one is not worthy of inclusion here. Bearian (talk) 17:41, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Procedural keep - nominated by a vandalism-only sock in evasion of their block, therefore this AfD is an act of vandalism Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:44, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete, mostly in agreement with Bearian (mainly: doesn't meet GNG, not NCORP). Spiderone's procedural argument is completely invalid. It doesn't matter who the nominator is, the discussion has taken it's course and the reality of the matter is pretty apparent. An AfD is a discussion. A substantive discussion can't ever be vandalism. — Alalch Emis (talk) 17:32, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.