Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sivayogi Sivakumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete under the WP:G7 criterion. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she&#124;they&#124;xe) 06:16, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Sivayogi Sivakumar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability has not been demonstrated - see discussion on talk page for more information. Created by WP:COI editor who circumvented WP:AFD after Draft:Sivayogi Sivakumar was declined for notability concerns by. Melcous (talk) 07:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Hinduism,  and Tamil Nadu. Shellwood (talk) 07:32, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: No major work done. Fails WP:GNG. Venkat TL (talk) 08:25, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi panel members,
 * Thank you for taking your time to review my article. Please go through my talks page (if not done already).
 * I thought I made my arguments properly. Yet I will present my argument once more.
 * The reference that I cited points out about various events about a guy named Sivayogi (some of which are reliabe source like Dinamalar, Dinamani)
 * If some one is into spirituality you could have heard about Sivayogi. Now how do I know this? I watched a lot of testimonial videos from his Youtube channel. It was given by real people. (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link) . As per the notability guidelines, what is generally accepted can be allowed into Wikipedia. This seems to be an accepted article to me based on sample size (number of real human feedback ). I didn't include this in the article because I am not trying to promote Sivayogi (Why give a conflict of interest tag? I met him in person only twice which I consider very important events of my life).
 * Regarding the arrest, the reviewer pointed out that number of people gets arrested daily. (implied So what is so notable about that?)  It was really a devastating blow for me. In India, people don't get arrested that easily for talking against religion. It is a secular nation. His video was 'voluntarily misinterpreted'  and a group protested twice. Tamilnadu Congress leader complained and tweeted against him. The cases are under investigation. Hence I removed all the details about the religion but it was included by the reviewer.
 * He has disciples(Indian and Tamilans) all over the world. How do I know that? I found lot of contents in his social media apart from Youtube. I didn't cite them but it is there (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link). Is it not notable enough?
 * The original reviewer kept on pointing me at the rules, regulations and policies. I tried making sense to the reviewer by showing that in past the notability test was overruled in certain occasions. I answered all the queries asked to me indirectly in the last reply of the talks page.
 * Zero by zero (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I concur with the nom after having read the extensive notability discussion on the articles talk page. Article hence fails WP:N and WP:V MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:44, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi panel members,
 * Thank you for taking your time to review my article. Please go through my talks page (if not done already).
 * I thought I made my arguments properly. Yet I will present my argument once more.
 * The reference that I cited points out about various events about a guy named Sivayogi (some of which are reliabe source like Dinamalar, Dinamani)
 * If some one is into spirituality you could have heard about Sivayogi. Now how do I know this? I watched a lot of testimonial videos from his Youtube channel. It was given by real people. (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link) . As per the notability guidelines, what is generally accepted can be allowed into Wikipedia. This seems to be an accepted article to me based on sample size (number of real human feedback ). I didn't include this in the article because I am not trying to promote Sivayogi (Why give a conflict of interest tag? I met him in person only twice which I consider very important events of my life).
 * Regarding the arrest, the reviewer pointed out that number of people gets arrested daily. (implied So what is so notable about that?)  It was really a devastating blow for me. In India, people don't get arrested that easily for talking against religion. It is a secular nation. His video was 'voluntarily misinterpreted'  and a group protested twice. Tamilnadu Congress leader complained and tweeted against him. The cases are under investigation. Hence I removed all the details about the religion but it was included by the reviewer.
 * He has disciples(Indian and Tamilans) all over the world. How do I know that? I found lot of contents in his social media apart from Youtube. I didn't cite them but it is there (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link). Is it not notable enough?
 * The original reviewer kept on pointing me at the rules, regulations and policies. I tried making sense to the reviewer by showing that in past the notability test was overruled in certain occasions. I answered all the queries asked to me indirectly in the last reply of the talks page.
 * Zero by zero (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only case for notability is being repeatedly arrested for religious defamation. Not enough for GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC).
 * Hi panel members,
 * Thank you for taking your time to review my article. Please go through my talks page (if not done already).
 * I thought I made my arguments properly. Yet I will present my argument once more.
 * The reference that I cited points out about various events about a guy named Sivayogi (some of which are reliabe source like Dinamalar, Dinamani)
 * If some one is into spirituality you could have heard about Sivayogi. Now how do I know this? I watched a lot of testimonial videos from his Youtube channel. It was given by real people. (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link) . As per the notability guidelines, what is generally accepted can be allowed into Wikipedia. This seems to be an accepted article to me based on sample size (number of real human feedback ). I didn't include this in the article because I am not trying to promote Sivayogi (Why give a conflict of interest tag? I met him in person only twice which I consider very important events of my life).
 * Regarding the arrest, the reviewer pointed out that number of people gets arrested daily. (implied So what is so notable about that?)  It was really a devastating blow for me. In India, people don't get arrested that easily for talking against religion. It is a secular nation. His video was 'voluntarily misinterpreted'  and a group protested twice. Tamilnadu Congress leader complained and tweeted against him. The cases are under investigation. Hence I removed all the details about the religion but it was included by the reviewer.
 * He has disciples(Indian and Tamilans) all over the world. How do I know that? I found lot of contents in his social media apart from Youtube. I didn't cite them but it is there (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link). Is it not notable enough?
 * The original reviewer kept on pointing me at the rules, regulations and policies. I tried making sense to the reviewer by showing that in past the notability test was overruled in certain occasions. I answered all the queries asked to me indirectly in the last reply of the talks page.
 * Zero by zero (talk) 11:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete does not meet requirements for WP:GNG Kazanstyle (talk) 09:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi panel members,
 * Thank you for taking your time to review my article. Please go through my talks page (if not done already).
 * I thought I made my arguments properly. Yet I will present my argument once more.
 * The reference that I cited points out about various events about a guy named Sivayogi (some of which are reliabe source like Dinamalar, Dinamani)
 * If some one is into spirituality you could have heard about Sivayogi. Now how do I know this? I watched a lot of testimonial videos from his Youtube channel. It was given by real people. (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link) . As per the notability guidelines, what is generally accepted can be allowed into Wikipedia. This seems to be an accepted article to me based on sample size (number of real human feedback ). I didn't include this in the article because I am not trying to promote Sivayogi (Why give a conflict of interest tag? I met him in person only twice which I consider very important events of my life).
 * Regarding the arrest, the reviewer pointed out that number of people gets arrested daily. (implied So what is so notable about that?)  It was really a devastating blow for me. In India, people don't get arrested that easily for talking against religion. It is a secular nation. His video was 'voluntarily misinterpreted'  and a group protested twice. Tamilnadu Congress leader complained and tweeted against him. The cases are under investigation. Hence I removed all the details about the religion but it was included by the reviewer.
 * He has disciples(Indian and Tamilans) all over the world. How do I know that? I found lot of contents in his social media apart from Youtube. I didn't cite them but it is there (If the panel wishes to see it, I can share you the link). Is it not notable enough?
 * The original reviewer kept on pointing me at the rules, regulations and policies. I tried making sense to the reviewer by showing that in past the notability test was overruled in certain occasions. I answered all the queries asked to me indirectly in the last reply of the talks page.
 * Thank you guys Zero by zero (talk) 11:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete run of the mill cleric, I find nothing to support notability. Oaktree b (talk) 13:09, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please don't ping me or repost the same answer you've done already 4 times above. Oaktree b (talk) 13:10, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks notability as others have mentioned. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:51, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 00:47, 21 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.