Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Generations (game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Six Generations (game)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Likely the result of paid editing (see entry at the COI noticeboard.) Non-notable board game, of the references given - the only one that would possibly qualify as a reliable source (article on a website associated with the Toronto Globe and Mail) is actually a reprint of a press-release. Several of the other sources are reprints of the same press-release, and the remaining are customer reviews. Google turns up no further sources that would qualify under WP:N. - 2 ... says you, says me 01:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also, I see that Six Generations is a redirect to the article, could the deleting admin (if consensus is reached to delete the article) please delete the redirect? --  Dylan 620  Efforts · Toolbox 01:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I did find a few articles on the game (4 or 5), but at least 3 of them were pay-per-view and from the same source, so there aren't enough reliable sources talking about this game to make it notable. Tim  meh  !  02:16, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's a well-written article (heck, it should be if somebody paid for it) but in the end the game itself doesn't meet WP:N, as it hasn't been covered in any detail by reliable sources.  Them From  Space  02:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Re the above reference to the Toronto Globe and Mail (Canada's largest daily): Of the thousands of press releases that newspaper receives each day, it saw fit to chose one written about this game for inclusion. Apparently, a board game celebrating immigration and ancestry is of considerably more importance to Canadian newspaper readers ... than to some others of us.ChulaOne (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Needs reliable sources and doesn't have any. The best one that the article's author can point to is a reprint of a press release. Really don't see any wiggle room here if no reliable sources are available. Drawn Some (talk) 16:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.