Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Six Theta Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:G5 deletion (sock-created page). Primefac (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Six Theta Design

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article that could have been easily accommodated in Six Sigma. Most of the sources point to Six Sigma and not here. Those that are relevant are advertisements for a company call Valcon who have Six Sigma Design as a registered trade mark.. The whole thing is probably a link spam article. Reads like an essay. Unneeded fork. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 12:29, 21 April 2017 (UTC)


 * KeepThe Six Theta framework (Six Theta Design) was created to improve and synthesize mechanical designs by offering KPIs and objective methods into mechanical design, which would give engineers a tool for comparing and improving their mechanical designs. Lubna.Iram (talk) 12:34, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * , just out of curiosity, could you give a non-jargon way of explaining why we should keep this article? I've seen you post almost this exact message in three places now, and I'm still no closer to understanding why we should care about it. Primefac (talk) 13:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Primefac, I am trying to clarify the importance of the topic. Six Theta Design is a new design in mechanical engineering. There is a Six Sigma design for mechanical engineers which is already present on Wikipedia. I see you concerned about my written style and formatting. I hope you can help to correct the formatting where I am wrong. I will appreciate. If you are concerned why I mentioned Valcon Design in article, people who invented this design belong to Valcon Design. If you want to remove these mentions of "Valcon Design", You can delete these specific sentences which are looking like a promoted content.Lubna.Iram (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 24 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Basically an ad for the company's proprietary tech, with insufficient non-affiliated sources available. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:55, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a new design methodology that is meant to be implemented by R&D BEFORE production and Six Sigma. It is thus making more robust designs lowering the tolerance demands and making the end result less susceptible to variance in the environment.103.255.4.99 (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.