Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixth Dimension (Ace Lightning)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus is that there is a lack of reliable sources to meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Sixth Dimension (Ace Lightning)

 * – (View AfD)

Notability concerns - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. PhilKnight (talk) 11:53, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Keep: The article lacks sources because there are very few sources. Most of the information comes from observing the video games and episodes. Can episodes be used as sources? Evilgidgit (talk) 16:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely plot summary and in-universe detail with no real-world content. Google search turned up fansites and passing mentions which indicates the notability requirement of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject cannot be satisfied. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:31, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Entirely plot summary and in-universe detail with no real-world content. Google search turned up fansites and passing mentions which indicates the notability requirement of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject cannot be satisfied. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 04:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 05:25, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As the author states in his own Keep comment, "The article lacks sources because there are very few sources."  Enough said. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 05:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.