Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sixty Mile


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:19, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Sixty Mile

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. I'm not sure why this mining property deserves its own article. Biscuit3413 (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Biscuit3413 (talk) 20:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. The key to getting this into Wikipedia would be to write an article that said substantially more than "this exists, the end", and reference it to a lot more reliable source coverage than just a directory entry and a glancing namecheck of its existence in one table of a 15-page paper on the magmatism of the entire cordillera. We are not an indiscriminate directory of everything that merely exists. Bearcat (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sign that this meets GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 03:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.