Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Size queen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus just not seeing the consensus that this is a dicdef. Very corny AfD though guys! In lieu of a third AfD people might consider a merge to Human penis size. But again, I'm not seeing consensus to delete outright. W.marsh 21:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Size queen

 * Size queen was nominated for deletion on 2005-08-13. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".  For the prior discussion, see Articles for deletion/Size queen/2005-08-13.



A dictionary definition, followed by some original research, followed by a list of examples, the few of which I have seen do not actually use this term. Even the original statement of the term, in the lead, lacks a source. Guy 16:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It is one of the many articles of the sexual slang category. Althought I have to admit many of them could be merged together into Listing of sexual slang or the like. Many of the articles are very short. --Pinkkeith 17:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This one would be a lot better if it were very short :-) Guy 17:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You prefer them short, huh? So not a size queen... Otto4711 17:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and mention in the linked penis size article the existence of the term, if it's not already there. Otto4711 17:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef. Recury 19:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, merge the 1-2 useful sentences into penis size. otherwise it's mainly dicdef (no pun intended...sorry). Crunk 19:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep valid topic; more than a dic(k)def. ;-) Carlossuarez46 01:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, well-known and easily expandible. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: A Google books search comes up with over 200 uses, including verifiable definitions. This can absolutely be a verifiable stub, expandible past a dicdef. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:28, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * What, you mean like Principles And Practice Of Constraint Programming - Cp 2004: 10th International Conference, CP... - Page 57 by M. (Mark) Wallace - Computers - 2004 - 822 pages ... (all(i in Size) queen(i] + i)); from the n-queens problem can be viewed as a shortcut for expr{mnt} d(m in Size) — queen(i) + S .post ( ..., and Portraits of the Ptolemies: Greek Kings as Egyptian Pharaohs - Page 76 by Paul Edmund Stanwick - 2003 - 256 pages ... under life-size queen with a triple uraeus in Paris also belongs here, although the quality of execution is lower (D26)... and, top hit, Turtorials on Emerging Methodologies and Applications in Operations Research: presented at... - Page 3-9 by Harvey J. Greenberg - Business & Economics - 2004 - 342 pages... in Size) queen [i] » v; Figure 3.4. A Simple N-Queens Constraint Program statement of constraints, and the search procedure. The program first declares ...? It's a dictdef.  It's in some dictionaries of sexual slang for sure, but that still makes it a dictdef.  Nothing is lost to humanity by a transwiki, after all. Guy (Help!) 17:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * You'll note I said "usable." Nothing is lost to humanity, no, but plenty is lost to Wikipedia. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom &mdash; AnemoneProj e ctors (talk) 20:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary and so dictionary entries should be moved elsewhere. Eluchil404 11:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.