Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Size queen/2005-08-13

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Counting rewrite as a keep vote. Woohookitty 06:51, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Size queen
What the heck is this? Hardly an encyclopedic treatment of the subject. Presumably has some sort of source to it, since part of the material says it is compiled by Steve Sullivan (presumably not the hockey player). Repeatedly cites sources with names like "jwats1968". Moreover, the page contains all kind of poorly-sourced or unsourced speculation about the penis sizes and preferences of celebrities. Not only is it uncomfirmable, it seems problematic legally. - Nat Krause 15:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Not encyclopedic original research. Reads like a chatroom prank. BJAODN. Aecis 15:47, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * keep, notable stereotype. VFD is not cleanup. Kappa 16:15, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Explodicle 16:56, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologistic original research. -Splash 17:48, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete and create a redirect to Human penis size in its place. -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:44, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite. This is definitely an actual notable slang term.  See here.  Vaguely UrbanDictionary-ish, I guess, but valid.  Hooper_X
 * Delete. An article to explain that some like 'em bigger? Inherently unverifiable and guaranteed to be packed with anecdotes and vandalism. The only upside I can see to this might be that we'd encourage people to upload some breathtaking pictures of themselves. And, mind you, I'm a size queen myself... / Peter Isotalo 02:46, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a real slang term with *cough* at least some cultural significance. Though I support nuking 95% of the actual content on the page. EDIT: Include this with Rewrite whoever ends up scoring these. Dalf | Talk 10:19, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Rewrite keeping about 5% of the content. This is a lot of gossip, not confirmable. The list of individuals should definitely go down the drain. / Habj 10:30, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I think there the list of individuals should not only be edited out but should be deleted from memory. I agree that there is maybe 5% content that could be kept, but not enough to sustain a separate article. We can merge that text with human penis size before deleting. - Nat Krause 03:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research. Nandesuka 13:17, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/Rewrite notable slang term. Agree, keep 5%ish of the original content. Jessamyn 02:06, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, trollbait, and not nearly enough info for an article; put a line about 'women who prefer large penises (penii?) are sometimes called "size queens" in Human penis size, and leave a redirect to there. Proto t c 09:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A successful cleanup on this article would result in a dicdef, which doesn't belong here.  -- Norvy (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.