Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skeff Anselm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Skeff Anselm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I prodded it with the following rationale, which I still consider valid: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (biographies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Peakipedia (Creator, WP:SPA) with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 12:28, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:37, 11 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:BLP, WP:GNG, WP:NMUSIC --Mr. Guye (talk) 03:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.