Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ski-slope nose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Human nose. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 15:42, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Ski-slope nose

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

What is this? It has context, but it lacks sense (if only that were a CSD). Ipatrol (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of sources. Alexius08 (talk) 01:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Human nose. It's probably a neologism for a type (shape) of human nose. This is a plausible search term, and as such should be redirected not deleted.  It can be merged as well if someone can come up with a source. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  01:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Here are a couple of sources that verify the existence of the term, which should be enough for merging with Human nose. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  02:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge or Re-Direct as per LinguistAtLarge but remove the OR statements concerning nasal aesthetics. Eddie.willers (talk) 14:33, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Just NN by itself. Bearian (talk) 18:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * "This nose is considered extremely ugly and undesirable."-- Author apparently has never heard of Bob Hope, who often referred to himself as "old ski nose".
 * Redirect as noted. Page is full of OR and is non-notable. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:10, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no sources. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:52, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.