Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skibidi Toilet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. I don't get this article but the consensus here shows an indication that this discussion should be closed as Speedy Keep. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Skibidi Toilet

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Skibidi toilet while a semi popular internet meme isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia page CPounds57 (talk) 00:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. CPounds57 (talk) 00:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Clicking the Google news search at the top of the AFD, I see good results. https://news.yahoo.com/skibidi-toilet-creepy-youtube-series-180500777.html and https://www.newsweek.com/what-skibidi-toilet-inside-eerie-videos-taking-over-internet-1813590 and of course plenty of referencesin the article. Reliable sources give it significant coverage, so it meets the general notability guidelines.   D r e a m Focus  00:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep as one of the main contributor of the article. There is plenty of independent sources reporting and giving commentary on this series. It have been used to show that a new generation, Alpha, is gaining prominence on the internet. You should explain how the currently references in the article does not demonstrate significant coverage. Ca talk to me! 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per @Dream Focus. Additionally, "semi popular" is debatable.
 * B3251 (talk) 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep many reliable and independent sources give significant coverage to the subject. Skyshifter   talk  02:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Georgia (country).  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * SNOW Keep: Poorly formed deletion rationale. Why? I Ask (talk) 08:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The notability concerns on the nomination are not sufficiently substantiated. It's not as self-evidently notable as others state, and the article does have issues and struggles to distinguish trivia from substance. But there's clearly a few mainstream articles from reliable news sources describing it and providing commentary on it as a fixture of online humor for younger generations. That's enough for GNG. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 09:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Reasoning is flawed. Ryme071 (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The series has half a billion views on the official playlist alone, isn't that notable enough? Finxx (talk) 20:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Snow Keep; bad deletion rationale and probably WP:IDONTLIKEIT. Internet memes can warrant articles in their own right, take "Press F to pay respects" for example. Negative  MP1  21:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Many of these keep arguments aren't the best and the article is not great either. However, as silly as it is, "Skibidi Toilet" is notable. I feel old just typing that out. There are a few good sources on the topic that are already in the article and its an ongoing popular series that will probably continue to get that coverage.  ULPS ( talk •  contribs ) 01:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.