Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkillTwins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

SkillTwins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was No sources or references (beyond their own page) are offered to support the information in the article or otherwise indicate notability. PROD was contested by the article's creator without providing a reason. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:44, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:36, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Giant Snowman; page seems promotional in nature. As I stated in the PROD, no independent sources are offered. 331dot (talk) 12:16, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete no indication of notability. Nfitz (talk) 18:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 20 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:FOOTBALL.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 21:25, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.