Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skill select australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Skill select australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A document related to immigration procedures not yet in effect, and lacking verifiable sources. Also unencyclopedic—it amounts to a guide on immigration procedures. Greenmaven (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

This is going to be a formidable source of information. What Wikipedia stands for is manifestation of various aspects of information on any subject, whether related to any subject. I strongly support reta--Free pretender (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)--Free pretender (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)--Free pretender (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)ining of articleFree pretender (talk) 20:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC) 
 * Comment Free pretender is the author of the article and of course supports its inclusion! --Greenmaven (talk) 04:20, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No indications of notability, and Wikipedia is not the Immigration department's website. Nick-D (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Seems like a mirror of the immigration website. I'd say it's too soon, perhaps when it actually comes into use.  I might add that "Wikipedia stands for is manifestation of various aspects of information on any subject, whether related to any subject" seems be a bit of a contradiction of the whole "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" policy, and definitely not one of the criteria for inclusion at WP:N. Millermk90 (talk) 07:01, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.