Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skilljar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Skilljar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

small company creating training courses, The articles are jist notices about funding anad a self serving interview with the proprietor  DGG ( talk ) 07:39, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 07:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 07:50, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - The Seattle Times article is a good start, but needs at least 1 more significant writeup in a non-trade magazine, which I'm not finding in my searches yet. --  1Wiki8 ........................... (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:44, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this is WP:TOOSOON; virtually every source is just about them raising money to do things that might make them notable later.  --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 11:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO; strictly promotional. No indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.