Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skin Salveation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Skin Salveation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to be an unremarkable company, failing WP:NCORP. I could not find any more independent coverage than the cited Northumberland Gazette piece (which reads mostly like a press release, perhaps not entirely independent) and a passing mention in this Guardian article. Lennart97 (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Lennart97 (talk) 14:50, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Skin Salveation was a very small company for one year between 2003 and 2004; thereafter it became a very small company called Dermasalve sciences ltd. until 2006, when it became a very small company called dermasalve ltd, which went broke in 2012, putting all four of its employees out of a job. The current article links to a company 'skin salve' whose address returns nothing from Companies house, and whose name is equally fruitless. Kompass list them as employing 0-9 employees. This is only one step up from one-person-and-a-web-page. Elemimele (talk) 21:42, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete This company lacks significant notability.TH1980 (talk) 03:11, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of notability or pass of WP:NORG. nearlyevil  665  06:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP, no references meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 14:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks SIGCOV to warrant inclusion as per NCORP.VirenRaval89 (talk) 12:16, 9 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.