Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skin care products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedily deleted by Jimfbleak. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 17:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Skin care products

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is in bad shape. Seems to be hodgepodge of various info without much of a context. No sources, no references...  Wikidudeman  (talk) 09:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to say weak keep, but I'm not seeing anything salvageable in the article as it is. Iotha 09:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * you must be kidding "Only (brand removed) skincare is clinically proven to", "ingredients are then delivered deep within the skin using a patented Time-Release Microsphere Delivery System", "The result is healthy, radiant and glowing skin—for life.". Speedy delete blatant spam -- lucasbfr talk 09:30, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Clearly qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:CSD as blatant marketing guff (it may also be a copyright violation, as it reads like copy-paste from promotional material), though personally I can see no harm in turning it into a redirect to Category:Skin care per the similar redirect at skin care. ~Matticus TC 10:29, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G11 Will (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.