Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skinny Alley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:00, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Skinny Alley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Concerns about the notability of this band. ‑Scottywong | prattle _ 19:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Sources are either from a social networking site (e.g. Myspace) or extremely weak. Admiral Caius (talk) 21:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 12:26, 10 February 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete — Fails WP:MUSICBIO.  STATic  message me!  04:55, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I suspect there is some notability here: you don't get signed to EMI for no reason. Still, I've been able to find nearly nothing to back up my suspicion that this is a potentially notable band disguised by a poor article.  The best I could find is the statement "...they enjoy cult status" in this article.  I'd be happy to change my vote if anyone finds more. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:02, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.