Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skinocracy

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:20, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC)

Skinocracy

 * Not a notable concept. 90 Google hits, no reference in Wikipedia. JoaoRicardo 21:51, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Those hits all seem to be on 5 web sites. Definition; I'd vote to move to Wiktionary if there was evidence it had significant or wide use, but I don't even see that for this neologism. -- Infrogmation 22:03, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its not a term I've ever heard used, and I've just been through the battery of anti-discrimination and equal oppotunities training, where various -ocracies formed part of the discussion. Thryduulf 22:10, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Would say move it to Wiktionary. Inter 23:09, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, dictionary definition, neologism. Megan1967 02:18, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. - Greaser 02:51, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd only call it a dicdef if I believed a dictionary would have it. -- ckape (talk) 03:25, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I've never heard of this. Besides, "skinocracy" doesn't sound right anyway. Shouldn't it be "dermocracy," or "keratinocracy," "melanocracy" or even "epitheliocracy"? Delete for being a neologism used by the ignorant. Inky 01:45, 18 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Axl 18:24, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Dermocruft" is too kind a description.  Edeans 23:49, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.