Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skip hire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Skip (container) in lieu of deletion. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-25 05:04Z 

Skip hire

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article with no discernible notability and reads pretty much like spam Janarius 16:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It reads like an attempt to write an encyclopaedia article on the history of skips in the United Kingdom, discussing the legislation that affected them, the changes in relative economic costs over the decades, the first company that leased them, and so forth. Uncle G 17:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've requested that the author provide sources for this. I'm leaning merge, but without sources I'm not sure I want to. --N Shar 18:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - original research, unverified, essay. Could in theory be cleaned up and sourced, but I'm not convinced that this article is encyclopedic. Walton monarchist89 18:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as currently unsourced and as mentioned, reads like an essay. I disagree with the opinion that it looks like an advertisement/spam however. Suriel1981 14:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.