Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skipp Townsend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn as per improvements made to the article. Bradv 01:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Skipp Townsend

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Biography of a living person, fails WP:BIO. No reliable sources given for verification. Apparently not eligible for BLPPROD as it has a link to his website. Bradv 19:12, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:25, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:V; an unreferenced essay. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:19, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * keep Notability appears to be there, although the page is obviously a PROMO by a purpose-created SPA.  Here  is a Canadian Broadcasting Corporation interview from which some bio details can be sources (text plus video as sources).  Ditto for this   Voice of America story (different story, different year). More detail from The Daily Beast  again, different context, different year.  Several pages of similar popped up on a simple gNews search.  continuing over several years, so, not W:P1E.  E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
 * keep - notable per several established sources and GNG.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment -- none of the sources presented have been added to the article, so I cannot vote "keep" just yet. WP:TNT still applies. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - because I always enjoy K.e.coffman's comments and have been more of a deletionist lately, I took the challenge and modified the article. Because I have now biased myself, I will defer from !voting. Regardless, I think this was a good nomination by Bradv and hope this moves the article in the right direction.--Rpclod (talk) 00:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per article improvements; an acceptable stub at this point. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:52, 28 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.