Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skippy List


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 18:31, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Skippy List

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research about someone's joke of dubious notability. Laudak (talk) 18:55, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Definitely not-notable. When are articles on lists notable?  Shapiros10  contact me My work  19:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete-per WP:NN, also only references are to the primary source, which is named after the article, and the other is a forum, which is not allowed as a reference per WP:V-- S R X -- Latino Heat  19:30, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Could not find any coverage of this topic in reliable sources via Google. Will change to keep if evidence of such coverage is forthcoming. Skomorokh  19:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Provisional Delete for failing our Verifiability and Notability policies. Will happily support keeping this article if multiple reliable sources are found which are independent of the list author / webhost.  S HEFFIELD S TEEL TALK 21:39, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Article may have been created as a prank. May be someone's original theory. Artene50 (talk) 10:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete per Skomorokh  and S HEFFIELD S TEEL  . Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  16:15, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. MrPrada (talk) 23:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Could you please elaborate on how you see WP:INDISCRIMINATE applying to this case? Thank you, Skomorokh  23:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Skippy's list is it self an indiscriminate collection of information, but merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. MrPrada (talk) 01:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.