Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skousen & Skousen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Skousen & Skousen

 * — (View AfD)

Found while clearing out CAT:CSD. Deletion reason was -- . This is not a valid speedy deletion reason, Looks to me to assert just enough importance as to not be a speedy. Also was disputed with a, though I got there before the poster had a chance to justify why. Therefore I nominated this to afd. Opinions on what to do with this? No Stance —— Eagle (ask me for help) 03:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. No assertion of notability. eaolson 04:02, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:CORP. MER-C 04:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't appear that there's enough there to warrent expansion of the article. SkierRMH, 08:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I tagged it as db-corp (which is, last I checked, a valid speedy template). After the hangon was added, author added the citation to the one cyber-squatting case, but that doesn't IMO make the firm notable. Per the cited findlaw link, seems to be a very small firm. Fan-1967 14:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Baristarim 19:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly an advertisement, and if db-corp won't do, then surely db-spam would?--Anthony.bradbury 22:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Looks like they only have 3 lawyers on their books - not really big enough to be notable unless they have some important/famous cases. Lethaniol 17:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.