Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skow for Girlfriends Films


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 08:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Skow for Girlfriends Films

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails the general notability guideline. PROD removed by a serial de-prodder who is giving the articles no actual consideration. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 19:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete PROD was not actually contested; a case of apparent vandalism. No sources, no notability - deserves a quick removal.  Scr ★ pIron IV 20:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I am neither a sockpuppet nor a vandal. Please strike that statement from your explanation. Thank you, 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A51D:74AE:FC51:1E65 (talk) 22:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Go strike yourself. Place yourself between your shoes and your feet. Walk on your own soles. Any old way, post your graffiti to someone else's comments.  Scr ★ pIron IV 22:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * See this discussion regarding this sock's vandalism of removing prod tags.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The studio won the award for Best New Line. And I'm not sure how the other prodder came to the conclusion that it isn't a real studio; in addition, as the creator, I was never notified of the original prod.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 20:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * You weren't notified because you've said to several users, myself included, that you don't want us posting anything to your talk page, courtesy notices included. This was your less-than-civil response the last time an editor on your hit list (an admin, in fact) did so.. Don't complain when other editors comply with your requests. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't recall saying that about courtesy notices, but if I don't want to be bothered by you, maybe that means you should, I don't know...recuse yourself from trying to delete articles I created? More importantly though, the last time I checked, Best New Line is an award given to a studio, not a "marketing tagline". And if you want more sources that indeed identify it as a studio, try .  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 01:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Gosh, Erpert, I don't want to be bothered by you. So are you going to stay out of deletion discussions I initiate, like this one, which began with my PROD? In fact, I don't want to be bothered by anybody who disagrees with me, so . . . The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 02:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per the logic of my original PROD. None of the cited sources identify the article subject as a studio, and the award announcement states the studio involved was "Girlfriends Films". This is just a marketing tagline for a non-notable porn director. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here. --Calton | Talk 21:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Merge to Girlfriends Films as, per the above highlighted links, it appears that "Skow for Girlfriends Films" appears to be some part of that much more well-known, parent adult film company. Guy1890 (talk) 06:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is a couple of sentences and a list. Can we please WRITE an article before creating one??? MiracleMat (talk) 08:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom and above editors. Nothing in searches to show they pass WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.