Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skrot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. per WP:CSD Mgm|(talk) 11:58, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Skrot

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NEOLOGISM, no assertion of use, notability, only verifiable search was an Urban Dictionary Entry, created on March 1. &lowast; \ / (⁂) 06:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wouldn't even consider the Urban Dictionary entry to be a reliable source.  I think this falls under WP:NEO AND WP:NFT.  Matt (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Neutral Point of View, the notability guidelines and WP:NEOLOGISM. Oli OR Pyfan! 08:31, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as vandalism. . .Rcawsey (talk) 09:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.